In the May 26, 2012 issue of the Vancouver Sun, Tara Carsman
and Douglas Todd “embarked upon a highly unscientific study” to find out what
academics, counsellors and divorce survivors thought were the Marriage-Killers.
Not surprisingly, they found that “family interference” was
high on most wanted list. John Boland, a Vancouver-based counsellor suggested
that loyalty to ‘couplehood’ should be paramount to loyalty to the extended family.
When in-laws are overly involved in the relationship offering unsolicited advice,
the strain can become unbearable.
Several months ago, I was contacted by a young Indo-Canadian
woman. She had been married only for a year, and had been living with her husband’s
family for most of that first year. She could not tolerate that her mother-in-law played such an
integral role in her marriage. Finally, the young bride convinced her husband
that they must move out from the in-laws’ home. Although this was certainly a
difficult decision for her husband given his divided loyalty, they ultimately
did move into their own home. However, she remained frustrated that
her mother-in-law was still involved, despite living separately from the
couple.
Admittedly, in some family settings, in-law involved is
acceptable practice and tolerated. For others, it’s the straw that breaks the
camel’s …marriage.
No comments:
Post a Comment